The article discusses how business sellers can mitigate the potential risk of 're-trade', a situation when deal terms are revised negatively at the last moment. Key strategies include proper preparation before negotiations, carrying out due diligence from a buyer's perspective, outlining non-negotiable terms to potential buyers, having alternate options, and validating the buyer's due diligence. The seller should be wary of certain warning signs that a re-trade may be forthcoming, such as vague offers, inadequate due diligence, and poor understanding of the business.
When selling a business, the timing and approach to engaging with potential buyers is crucial. A measured approach is necessary to maintain buyer interest and avoid potential pitfalls. Clear objectives should be defined before initiating discussions; their interest and strategic fit should be assessed before discussing value. Testing the waters before being prepared to sell or without realistic expectations can lead to negative consequences. Engaging an experienced M&A advisor can help determine a value estimate and facilitate negotiations. Sequentially engaging with buyers individually may complicate transactions.
Selling a business can be challenging, especially as buyers closely analyze potential risks. These could be risks that sellers, due to their familiarity with the business operations, may see as immaterial. Buyers often focus on the inherent risks rather than the upside potential and discount their offer to cover perceived risks. It is important for sellers to understand this fear-based perspective, and objectively identify all conceivable risks in their operations, market, employees, suppliers, etc. Demonstrating flexibility around deal structures can help alleviate buyers' risk concerns, thereby enhancing the potential for a successful sale.
An earnout mechanism, used by buyers and sellers during M&A negotiations, can bridge differing valuation perspectives by tying a portion of the purchase price to future business performance. Data shows that 27% of sub-$50 million deals involve an earnout. However, it poses risks for sellers who lose control over business decisions that may affect the payout. Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, complexity could increase with earnouts potentially becoming a bigger part of the deal and extending over longer periods. Properly structured earnouts can mutually benefit sellers and buyers, but require careful consideration due to their legal and tax implications.
In the M&A process, sellers often present inflated financial projections to attract buyers. However, this can breed skepticism and even harm negotiation positions. Instead, sellers should demonstrate a correlation between past actions and results, present realistic projections based on past performance, and detail all necessary investments for plan execution. Additionally, incorporating a well-crafted business plan and credible financial projections from the outset significantly improves negotiation positions.